Kegg Pathway: Pancreatic cancer

KEGG ID: 05212

Reference Diagram

KEGG Diagram for Pancreatic cancer

Rat

There are 70 IPI Records from this pathway found in Rattus norvegicus.

Location of Pancreatic cancer proteins on Rat Genome

IPI Record Position
1: Acvr1b 7:139937993-139958724
2: Acvr1c 3:40027228-40102299
3: Akt1 6:137640482-137657552
4: Akt2 1:82686233-82726544
5: Akt3 13:92807672-92924984
6: arhgef6 X:141946362-142068557
7: Bad 1:209617373-209626292
8: Bcl2l1 3:143129087-143180199
9: Braf 4:67121585-67243058
10: Brca2 12:4282952-4323693
11: Casp9_v1 5:160704225-160721802
12: Ccnd1 1:205360031-205366632
13: Cdc42 5:156106131-156143040
14: Cdk4 7:67016944-67018905
15: Cdk6 4:27362748-27618018
16: Cdkn2a 5:108908749-108916380
17: Chuk_predicted 1:249122847-249157179
18: E2f1 3:145032716-145054799
19: Egf 2:227107576-227194674
20: Egfr 14:97617358-97788213
21: Erbb2 10:87219085-87242919
22: Figf X:50829626-50864445
23: Ikbkb 16:73805082-73858088
24: Ikbkg X:160407166-160420190
25: Jak2 1:232928515-232974587
26: Kras 4:182869242-182895106
27: Map2k1 8:68379077-68451583
28: Mapk1 11:85968732-86030389
29: Mapk10 14:7865731-8010694
30: Mapk3 1:185935044-185941249
31: Mapk8 16:8925133-8954535
32: Mapk9 10:35344672-35384319
33: Nfkb1 2:233091020-233187501
34: Nfkb2 1:251521559-251527815
35: Pgf 6:109218054-109225818
36: Pik3ca 2:118640277-118670170
37: Pik3cb 8:103886682-103957112
38: Pik3cd_predicted 5:166735338-166750186
39: Pik3cg_predicted 6:50444793-50477111
40: Pik3r1 2:32602673-32675350
41: Pik3r2 16:19171101-19179650
42: Pik3r3 5:136497494-136566473
43: Pld1 2:115306925-115460518
44: Rac1 12:11380314-11400531
45: Rac2 7:116520066-116532482
46: Raf1 4:151752583-151775613
47: Rala 17:55017444-55030555
48: Ralb 13:32229645-32238421
49: Ralbp1 9:104617411-104653913
50: Ralgds 3:7516054-7537635
51: Rb1 15:53828905-53961923
52: Rela 1:208263316-208272419
53: RGD1561600_predicted 17:41160371-41167549
54: RGD1563261_predicted 10:55182226-55247889
55: RGD1563603_predicted 3:105628270-105649462
56: Smad2 18:73180290-73241713
57: Smad3 8:67803909-67952056
58: Smad4 18:70432832-70461485
59: Stat3 10:89821078-89872970
60: Stat5a 10:89795404-89819732
61: Tgfa 4:120355649-120435178
62: Tgfb1 1:80894439-80910881
63: Tgfb2 13:102718703-102818939
64: Tgfb3 6:110173443-110195215
65: Tgfbr1 5:63976868-64034058
66: Tgfbr2 8:120593595-120680453
67: Tp53 10:56399668-56411149
68: Vegfa 9:10521733-10534238
69: Vegfb 1:209657632-209665750
70: Vegfc 16:40624417-40739692

Mouse

There are 70 IPI Records from this pathway found in Mus musculus.

Location of Pancreatic cancer proteins on Mouse Genome

IPI Record Position
1: Acvr1b 15:101002159-101040635
2: Acvr1c 2:58087208-58140193
3: Akt1 :-
4: Akt2 7:27300516-27348213
5: Akt3 1:178862039-178967772
6: Araf X:20005537-20017478
7: Arhgef6 X:53578271-53685513
8: Bad 19:7008905-7018937
9: Bcl2l1 2:152458757-152523123
10: Braf 6:39543731-39654902
11: Brca2 5:150791023-150838107
12: Casp9 4:141065688-141088051
13: Ccnd1 7:144739321-144749220
14: Cdc42 4:136591778-136629755
15: Cdk4 10:126466564-126470344
16: Cdk6 5:3350318-3528231
17: Chuk 19:44126647-44160756
18: E2f1 2:154250848-154261333
19: E2f2 4:135444470-135468133
20: E2f3 13:29914040-29993528
21: Egf 3:129669600-129747338
22: Egfr 11:16652206-16813912
23: Erbb2 11:98228574-98253806
24: Figf X:159717653-159746755
25: Ikbkb 8:24124758-24172108
26: Ikbkg X:70677332-70704240
27: IPI00678029 :-
28: Jak1 4:100650299-100763214
29: Kras 6:145173866-145207390
30: Map2k1 9:63983787-64051430
31: Mapk1 16:16896945-16961016
32: Mapk10 5:103148770-103149081
33: Mapk3 7:126550780-126556964
34: Mapk8 14:32209888-32276220
35: Mapk9 11:49690177-49729834
36: Nfkb1 3:135292997-135605172
37: Nfkb2 19:46358111-46365401
38: Pgf 12:86058457-86066066
39: Pik3ca 3:32627755-32654380
40: Pik3cb 9:98847754-98949439
41: Pik3cd 4:148492970-148542498
42: Pik3cg 12:32758720-32793858
43: Pik3r1 13:102781018-102868441
44: Pik3r2 8:73697168-73705691
45: Pik3r3 4:115719846-115800988
46: Pik3r5 11:68248320-68314041
47: Pld1 3:28129768-28324307
48: Rac1 5:143761100-143783654
49: Rac2 15:78386424-78400038
50: Rac3 11:120537558-120540059
51: Rad51 2:118804258-118827511
52: Raf1 6:115584217-115642173
53: Rala 13:17665717-17729359
54: Ralb 1:121297858-121332182
55: Ralbp1 17:65747974-65784415
56: Ralgds 2:28335340-28375090
57: Rb1 14:71929657-72059946
58: Rela 19:5637490-5648130
59: Smad2 18:76367274-76431096
60: Smad3 9:63444773-63556000
61: Smad4 :-
62: Stat1 1:52064035-52066799
63: Stat3 11:100701188-100755630
64: Tgfa 6:86228789-86237128
65: Tgfb1 7:25395762-25413756
66: Tgfb2 1:188324430-188406777
67: Tgfb3 12:86945904-86968101
68: Tgfbr1 4:47374405-47436024
69: Tgfbr2 9:115932995-116023987
70: Trp53 11:69396600-69407992
71: Vegfa 17:45480574-45495331
72: Vegfb 19:7049516-7054647
73: Vegfc 8:55576304-55685794

Human

There are 70 IPI Records from this pathway found in Homo sapiens.

Location of Pancreatic cancer proteins on Human Genome

IPI Record Position
1: ACVR1B 12:50494095-50677124
2: ACVR1C 2:158097152-158193645
3: AKT1 14:104306734-104333125
4: AKT2 19:45430084-45483036
5: AKT3 1:241718158-242080053
6: ARAF X:47305460-47316249
7: ARHGEF6 X:135575372-135691913
8: BAD 11:63793878-63808740
9: BCL2L1 20:29715916-29774366
10: BRAF 7:140080754-140271033
11: BRCA2 13:31787617-31871806
12: CASP9 1:15687322-15723527
13: CCND1 11:69165054-69178422
14: CDC42 1:22235157-22292024
15: CDK4 12:56428272-56432431
16: CDK6 7:92072175-92301148
17: CDKN2A 9:21957751-21984490
18: E2F1 20:31727147-31737871
19: E2F2 1:23705509-23730300
20: E2F3 6:20510377-20601921
21: EGF 4:111053499-111152860
22: EGFR 7:55054219-55242524
23: ERBB2 17:35104766-35138441
24: FIGF X:15273640-15312498
25: IKBKB 8:42247986-42309130
26: IKBKG X:153423653-153446455
27: JAK1 1:65071500-65204775
28: KRAS 12:25249449-25295121
29: MAP2K1 15:64466674-64570935
30: MAPK1 22:20446873-20551730
31: MAPK10 4:87156656-87511051
32: MAPK3 16:30032951-30042116
33: MAPK8 10:49184739-49317409
34: MAPK9 5:179595388-179640218
35: NFKB1 4:103641518-103757506
36: NFKB2 10:104144320-104152271
37: PGF 14:74479162-74492220
38: PIK3CA 3:180349005-180435189
39: PIK3CB 3:139856921-139960875
40: PIK3CD 1:9634390-9711564
41: PIK3CG 7:106292977-106334801
42: PIK3R1 5:67547360-67633403
43: PIK3R2 19:18125016-18142343
44: PIK3R3 1:46278399-46371054
45: PIK3R5 17:8722953-8756559
46: PLD1 3:172800889-173010929
47: RAC1 7:6380651-6410120
48: RAC2 22:35951238-35970241
49: RAC3 17:77582821-77585366
50: RAD51 15:38774661-38811646
51: RAF1 3:12600108-12680678
52: RALA 7:39629687-39714240
53: RALB 2:120726884-120768753
54: RALBP1 18:9465007-9527596
55: RALGDS 9:134962928-135014542
56: RB1 13:47775912-47954123
57: RELA 11:65177649-65186959
58: SMAD2 18:43618435-43711221
59: SMAD3 15:65145249-65274586
60: SMAD4 18:46810611-46860142
61: STAT1 2:191542121-191587181
62: STAT3 17:37718869-37794039
63: TGFA 2:70527927-70634438
64: TGFB1 19:46528254-46551628
65: TGFB2 1:216586200-216684584
66: TGFB3 14:75494195-75517242
67: TGFBR1 9:100907233-100956406
68: TGFBR2 3:30622998-30710635
69: TP53 17:7512464-7531642
70: VEGFA 6:43845924-43862202
71: VEGFB 11:63758646-63762834
72: VEGFC 4:177841685-177950889

Google Scholar

Recent Literature

Stress-associated hormone, norepinephrine, increases proliferation and IL-6 levels of human Pancreatic duct epithelial cells and can be inhibited by the dietary agent, sulforaphane.

Int J Oncol. 2008 Aug; 33(2): 415-9
Chan C, Lin HJ, Lin J

In current literature there is evidence that psychological factors can affect the incidence and progression of some cancers. Data obtained from animal models support the hypothesis that stress can be a cofactor. The underlying mechanisms for the association between psychological factors and Pancreatic cancer are very poorly understood. In this study, we examined the possible growth promoting effects of the stress-associated hormone, norepinephrine, on immortalized human Pancreatic duct epithelial cells. Our results suggest that norepinephrine can increase cell proliferation of human Pancreatic duct epithelial cells. We also evaluated the ability of norepinephrine to induce interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). All of which may promote oncogenesis of immortalized human Pancreatic duct epithelial cells. We found that norepinephrine can increase the IL-6 and VEGF but not IL-10 levels secreted by human Pancreatic duct epithelial cells. Since norepinephrine can increase cell proliferation of human Pancreatic duct epithelial cells, we performed further testing to see if dietary agents, sulforaphane and resveratrol, can inhibit norepinephrine-mediated increases in cell proliferation in human Pancreatic duct epithelial cells. Interestingly, our results demonstrated that sulforaphane but not resveratrol inhibits norepinephrine-mediated increases in cell viability in human Pancreatic duct epithelial cells. Furthermore, sulforaphane also inhibits norepinephrine-mediated increase of the IL-6 levels but not VEGF levels. Our study is the first to demonstrate that stress-associated hormone, norepinephrine, can increase the cell proliferation and IL-6 levels of human Pancreatic duct epithelial cells, which can be inhibited by sulforaphane, a chemopreventive agent and a natural compound from the Cruciferous vegetables.

Prevention and delay in progression of human Pancreatic cancer by stable overexpression of the opioid growth factor receptor.

Int J Oncol. 2008 Aug; 33(2): 317-23
Zagon IS, Kreiner S, Heslop JJ, Conway AB, Morgan CR, McLaughlin PJ

This study examined overexpression of the opioid growth factor receptor (OGFr) in Pancreatic cancer cells and phenotypic changes in tumorigenicity. Tumors of MIA PaCa-2 cells transfected with OGFr cDNA (OGFr-1) had 3.3 times more OGFr than empty vector (EV) neoplasias, and 4.3 times more OGFr than tumors from wild-type (WT) mice. No differences in OGFr binding were detected between tumors of EV and WT animals. Tumor incidence in OGFr-1 animals was reduced by up to 50% from EV mice. Latency times for OGFr-1 tumor expression were increased 30%, tumor volume was decreased 70%, and DNA synthesis was reduced 24% relative to EV mice. Exogenous OGF reduced OGFr-1 tumor volume up to 55% compared to OGFr-1 mice given vehicle. These data support OGFr gene function as a regulator of cell proliferation that impacts on tumorigenic expression, and suggest that molecular and pharmacological manipulation of OGFr may prevent or delay human Pancreatic cancer.

Expression and potential function of the CXC chemokine CXCL16 in Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Int J Oncol. 2008 Aug; 33(2): 297-308
Wente MN, Gaida MM, Mayer C, Michalski CW, Haag N, Giese T, Felix K, Bergmann F, Giese NA, Friess H

CXC chemokines have a major influence on the angiogenesis, growth and metastatic potential of Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. CXCL16 is a unique transmembrane CXC chemokine, which is shed by members of the disintegrins and metalloproteases (ADAMs), in particular by ADAM10 and ADAM17. In our study, we evaluated expression and potential function of CXCL16 and its receptor CXCR6. CXCL16 and the receptor CXCR6 are upregulated in Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis tissues in contrast to normal Pancreatic tissues at the mRNA and protein levels. In 85 and 100% of the investigated samples, tumor cells showed positive immuno-staining for CXCL16 and CXCR6, respectively; furthermore, tubular complexes of chronic pancreatitis and the invasive front of PDAC were immunopositive for CXCL16 and CXCR6. Stimulation of PDAC cells with proinflammatory cytokines increased CXCL16 protein levels, whereas silencing of ADAM10 with siRNA transfection led to a decrease in CXCL16 protein levels in cell culture supernatants. No effects on cell viability were notable after incubation of cancer cells with CXCL16. However, CXCL16 markedly increased invasiveness of PDAC cells. Clinically, 82.5% of PDAC patients had higher CXCL16 serum values than the highest value seen in healthy donors. SELDI-TOF-MS analysis confirmed the upregulation of CXCL16 in sera of PDAC patients. In conclusion, CXCL16 in both transmembrane and soluble forms, and its receptor CXCR6, seem to play an important role in the pathobiology of Pancreatic cancer and might be potential markers for Pancreatic cancer diagnosis and a target for multimodal therapy concepts in the future.

Adenoviral Gene Therapy for Pancreatic cancer: Where Do We Stand?

Dig Surg. 2008 Jul 17; 25(4): 278-292
Kuhlmann KF, Gouma DJ, Wesseling JG

Background: The prognosis of patients with Pancreatic cancer is poor. This is mainly caused by the late diagnosis, the aggressive biology and the lack of effective treatment modalities. Adenoviral gene therapy has the potential to selectively treat both primary tumor and (micro)metastatic tissue. Methods: This review provides an overview of what has been achieved so far in the field of adenoviral gene therapy for Pancreatic cancer. Results: Transductional targeting allows decreased toxicity due to vector dissemination to non-target cells and permits delivery with a lower viral dose. It can evade or diminish the immune response, which remains a major problem. Transcriptional targeting evolves quickly but essential drawbacks such as the lack of an efficient animal model delay clinical application. Few clinical trials utilizing adenoviruses have been performed in patients with Pancreatic cancer today. Worldwide, only seven phase III trials are being performed investigating adenoviral vectors in cancer patients. Conclusion: A clear therapeutic effect of adenoviral gene therapy in Pancreatic cancer has not yet been achieved, because the step from bench to bedside has encountered drawbacks. Combinations of the different targeting strategies and techniques to evade the immune system harbor the future for adenoviral gene therapy in patients with Pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic tail cancer with sole manifestation of left flank pain: a very rare presentation.

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Jun; 24(6): 324-7
Lin HL, Kuo LC, Chen CW, Lin YK, Lee WC

Pancreatic cancer is sometimes called a "silent disease" because it often causes no symptoms in the early stage. The symptoms can be quite vague and various depending on the location of cancer in the pancreas. The anatomic site distribution is 78% in the head of the pancreas, 11% in the body, and 11% in the tail. Pancreatic cancer is rarely detected in the early stage, and it is very uncommon to diagnose Pancreatic tail cancer during an emergency department visit. The manifestation of Pancreatic tail cancer as left flank pain is very rare and has seldom been identified in the literature. We present a case of Pancreatic tail cancer with the sole manifestation of dull left flank pain. Having negative findings on an ultrasound study initially, this female patient was misdiagnosed as having possible acute gastritis, urolithiasis or muscle strain after she received gastroendoscopy and colonofiberscopy. Her symptoms persisted for several months and she visited our emergency department due to an acute exacerbation of a persistent dull pain in the left flank area. Radiographic evaluation with computed tomography was performed, and Pancreatic tail tumor with multiple metastases was found unexpectedly. We review the literature and discuss this rare presentation of Pancreatic tail cancer.

R